Welcome Guest, Give the Gift of Health to Your Loved Ones
Edition 2018-09-04
Unless you are a member of one of Dr. Davis’ subscriber forums, such as Undoctored Inner Circle (where you may be viewing this article), your web interactions with him are constrained by the limitations of his blogs, the UdB: Undoctored Blog (blog.undoctored.com) and WBB: Wheat Belly Blog (wheatbellyblog.com/blog/).
Here are some tips in FAQ form, based entirely on user trial and error, as an ordinary* reader of the blogs. This applies only to the blogs, and not Wheat Belly on FaceBook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Google+ or YouTube. I do not follow WB on those sites.
For the benefit of infrequent legacy users, the Wheat Belly Blog changed format in May 2014. The present how-to article was updated to cover what WBB users need to know under the new layout. WordPress itself changed in mid 2018.
Yes, for most videos posted in 2017 or later. Longer videos, and those with extensive visual content, may not have transcripts. Most of these transcripts are done by me.
Where there isn’t a transcript: for the hearing-impaired and those with platform limitations, the video content that is hosted by YouTube, as seen at YouTube, has optional Closed Captioning, selected by controls at lower right. Note that these subtitles are speech-to-text apparently generated by YouTube, and are well less than fully accurate. Any Vimeo-hosted content appears to lack a CC feature.
The UdB has no search feature at all. The WBB’s own Search engine is a bit weak. It apparently only finds content in post titles and basenote content, and never in user Replies. There is no longer a side list of common topics linked to multiple articles on those topics (which wasn’t comprehensive even in the old format). The FAQ link is still a very short list.
To search the blogs more extensively, use an external search engine, such as UdB: Google Advanced WBB: Google Advanced, In either case, restricting the "site or domain" to blog.undoctored.com or wheatbellyblog.com (pre-loaded for the links shown).
To find your own replies later, bookmark them as soon as you post them. If there are few enough Replies on a topic when you do that, note that the URL (aka http link or web shortcut) may change when older replies are shifted off to numbered page links. Your original URL will at least get you to the correct topic. Update the bookmark as needed (as I have to do periodically for various articles I maintain that link to blog comments).
Anyone, choosing any user name, but probably requiring a real email address (not visible to other readers).
The user name is published. I would suggest using a reasonably unique user name, so that your prior comments can more easily be found via external search, and so that you aren’t mistaken for someone else when discussing specific situations.
The blog apparently does not check for user name conflicts, so you can accidentally use the same name someone else has used. The blog may check for abusive names, and deliberately spoofing someone else is apt to have consequences.
The email address is not published. The email address is probably vetted (by means other than sending an email). If it’s not from a blacklisted domain, and not specifically blocked due to prior abuse, it’s likely good to go.
Any Website URL is applied to the published user name. The “Website” field is optional, so leave it blank if you haven’t an obvious use for it. You can change it from Reply to Reply. The following are useful uses:
I often used to use it to point to this same article on Wheat Free Forum, and now use it to point to an extended disclosure statement here on UIC.
The Website field is frequently abused by spammers, scammers, trolls, as well as crackers who want to lead readers to malware. This usually results in the link being removed shortly thereafter, but can easily result in the entire reply being deleted, and if the abuse is blatant and obvious; banning. Vacuous reply prose with links to commercial sites get deleted. Almost any kind of reply with links to sites clearly incompatible with Undoctored and Wheat Belly gets deleted. Links to almost any kind of “affiliate” site results in link removal at the very least.
If you have a WordPress account, and are using the email address associated with it, the blog will use any avatar you have set up and currently selected.
The blog may or may not also use some social media API, and so by default may depend on:
If you don’t have enough of the above to get an avatar to appear, use Gravatar (which creates a free WordPress account). Be aware of a couple of caveats on that:
You might want to create a new email account for the purpose. I can tell you that having a Yahoo account with an avatar, and posting replies using that email address, does not pull in that avatar.
You can’t. It’s not a forum. If you are interested in addressing the community of Undoctored/Wheat Belly followers, you can: • join Undoctored Inner Circle, or • create a free account on Wheat Free Forum.
If you are trying to get Dr. D’s attention, post as a Reply to a suitable topic (but see Locked Threads issue below). For a question, be sure to use an external search first.
And no, there is no published email address for the Dr., other than for media. If any addresses he uses become widely known, he’ll probably have to abandon them.
Dr. D. creates a new topic and copies your Reply into it. Here’s a WBB example: (Flash in the Pan Fad Diet?).
ALT="X"
HTML markup supported is described at the bottom of this article.
Maybe. He only responds to a very small percentage of reader comments, which is not surprising given the amount of time it would take to respond to them all. He does seem to be more likely to respond if the question is on-topic, of general interest, hasn’t been previously addressed on the blog or in the books, or only needs a quick easy answer.
There are a number of regular blog readers who respond to questions that have been addressed before, or are answered in the books, or where the question needs some additional detail to enable an answer. One of those readers is me. When a reader answer handles the matter, it may be the only answer provided.
Dr. Davis is more likely to respond to questions on the UIC Forum. Although a subscription site, you can see entire basenotes, and responses with 250 characters or less. There’s no indication that Dr. Davis ever visits other nutrition or health forums other than those he operates.
Presumably, something about that reply caused it to get placed in moderation, and it didn’t get released until after the thread closed, and then released.
The most comprehensive way is to use the blog RSS (Really Simple Syndication) feature. Although neither blog displays icons for these, RSS is available: UdB: E: Entries (Articles) Feed feature WBB: E: Entries (Articles) Feed feature or the UdB: C: Comments (Replies) Feed feature. WBB: C: Comments (Replies) Feed feature.
You can Subscribe to all changes, Comments, or just new content on a single thread, using whatever RSS features or extensions are available for your browser. I use Live Bookmarks in Firefox to track new Comments on all open threads, for example. The blogs do not appear to have a Push capability enabled.
The [SIGN UP!] and [YES! SIGN ME UP!] feature at {blog} right (maybe top on mobile) results in Newsletter emails, which are periodic (not instant) include links to new base articles, recipes and other material, but nothing on Blog comments.
If you post a comment (and you do need to post a comment for these), the: Notify me of new posts by email generates instant emails on new Blog articles, but nothing for new comments. and Notify me of follow-up comments by email. generates an email for each new comment reply on just the current thread, but not new articles.
When you sign up for email notifications (but not RSS), you get an email with a link to confirm it. You get a new one of these on your first response to any thread. This prevents someone from maliciously flooding your email box.
The new article email notifications are sent instantly.
Any of the emails can be cancelled by following an unsubscribe link at the bottom of any recent similar email.
If the Notify me of follow-up comments by email. is missing, you are on a draft blog page. Don’t post your comment there. It may not be seen by anyone, and you won’t be notified of responses.
Preserve your comment text and repost it on some open thread found from the main blog. These orphan draft pages are being routinely de-linked
In December 2015 through February 2016, that WordPress feature became unreliable for the WBB. I was personally getting a confirmation email less than half the time. It could happen again. When they work, these emails are sent immediately. If you don’t get one (but have previously), just click this link to the WordPress Pending page. Check the boxes for the threads you want to follow and click [Confirm].
If you’ve never gotten a confirmation email, make sure your ISP and/or email client filters aren’t treating WordPress email as spam or junk.
Means the thread closed to comments while you were composing your remarks. I’ve had this happen once.
Use your browser back feature. Copy the comment from the edit window. Post it on an open thread.
If Dr. Davis hasn’t posted or re-posted in 14 days, no posts will be open for comments. Wait a few days.
User Name December 8, 2016 at 4:06 PM ⇐ this dateline is a permalink
The date line that appears under usernames on replies is a permalink to that specific comment. Right-click/copy, or just click on it and copy it out of the browser’s target dialog.
Most commonly, it means that Dr. Davis re-posted an older article (including all of its comments). This changes the base URL of the article, and breaks any links to where it used to be, and any deep links to replies on it. If you can, let the referencing author know about the 404 link. They might be able to update it.
Less frequently, the blog undergoes a complete re-organization, such as in May 2014. This can cause the above problem, and some things may just vanish entirely.
Very little HTML markup is allowed in Comments by the Wordpress blog engine. Avoid the use the common Latin (ASCII) < (less than) and > (greater than) characters except as the few HTML tags (elements, aka tags) that are known to work. < causes problems even inside HTML attribute quotes, so avoid it except as deliberate markup, or "escaped" as entity >
In particular, do not attempt to quote in <this style>. The blog engine deletes any unsupported content inside the pair, and renders it as <>. Posting an empty <> pair causes the <> to be deleted as well. Using ordinary straight double quotes ("as here") is fine for simple cases. WP converts them to curly quotes (“as here”).
Because the blog has no Preview, Edit or Delete, if you are going to try markup, you really need to be using an independent tool that provides HTML validation, HTML preview and line wrap without line breaks. I don’t plan to expand this into a tutorial. These markups are listed for the benefit of those with some fluency in HTML.
The following HTML elements have been reported to work in comments on Wordpress blogs. I have not tested them on any other WP blogs. I do not know yet know how many Attributes are allowed.
<a>, <abbr>, <acronym>, <b>, <blockquote>, <code>, <em>, <i>, <strong>
As <acronym> was officially dropped for HTML5 I’d expect Wordpress to either stop allowing it, or convert it to <abbr> at some point. So use <abbr>.
Although elided after posting, <p> and </p>, and <br> or <br /> may be safely used for proof-read formatting in your HTML editor, as long as <p> and <br… start a new line in your raw text.
<address> does not work, although some sources claim it’s supposed to on Wordpress.
cite= gets served out, but is metadata only title= works id= is stripped out name= is stripped out style= is stripped out.
There’s a good chance that HTML named and numbered (decimal or hex) entities all get served. Numbered entities need a test, and browser support for entities is not universal, especially, I expect, for those that are recently adopted Unicode.
Found to work so far: • (•), ° (°), … (…), ( ), ω (ω), √ (√), « («), » (»), “ (“), ” (”), < (<), > (>)
Higher order Unicode characters, however entered, may not be served as-is. They may get served out as <img> SVG’s hosted on the WP site, and tagged with alt="Ü", where Ü is the actual Unicode character you typed in (probably whether as text or HTML Entity markup). No, that doesn’t mean that YOU can use the <img> tag
___________ Bob Niland [disclosures] [topics]
* I became a Blog Reply Associate (now just Blog Associate) on the Wheat Belly Blog some years after first authoring this How-To article.