Welcome Guest, Give the Gift of Health to Your Loved Ones
Edition: 2017-07-31
I’m not actually sure this is open for debate, but what do people want in the way of macronutrient, or even micronutrient data for program recipes?
(In case HH wants to set this up as a poll)
There’s a further sub-question of: where does any macro or micro info need to appear? Possibilities might include but not be limited to: recipe footnote book appendix open-access website subscription website
Web hosting of macro/micro data has the advantage of being able to both revise the numbers as new data arises, and evolve the presentation as new elements need to be considered.
The program suggests counting two things: 1. net carbs (to max) 2. prebiotic fiber carbs (to target) 3. imprecise recipes
(1) NC may be presumed to be 15 grams or less for program recipes, but where the recipe is for only one element of a meal, that may not be sufficient data.
(2) Prebiotic fiber carbs are a major nuisance to determine. NF panels are close to useless on this as the "Fiber Carb" number is just an upper bound, and the prebiotic fraction can easily be zero. Resources for ingredient content are hard to come by, and almost always involve highly-error-prone units conversions and scaling math.
(3) Recipes offering a choice of ingredients, or amounts thereof, would result in needing a range for macro/micro data. "Sweeten to taste", "use almond or coconut flour", "blueberries optional"; that sort of thing.
The original Wheat Belly book did not include macros for the recipes. People complained on the blog, and the two cookbooks that followed include macros. Two recent books do not have macros, nor do recent blog recipes, and people are once again complaining (example, example, example, example).
___________ Bob Niland [disclosures] [topics]